The Client

​

A Hunter Douglas Gallery serving several distinct markets across a largely rural area with wide geographic separation between territories.

The business operated across multiple communities with differing levels of demand, market dynamics, and opportunity, creating a need for a more deliberate approach to how sales attention, marketing resources, and market visibility were allocated.

​

The Challenge

​

Sales coverage and customer acquisition were fragmented across the service area, limiting the business’s ability to concentrate time, attention, and marketing resources where they could have the greatest impact.

The territory was being treated too broadly rather than as a collection of distinct markets. This reduced the ability to align sales activity, digital acquisition, service coverage, and local visibility around the communities the business actually served.

Paid advertising also extended beyond the practical service territory, creating the potential for marketing dollars to be spent reaching consumers in areas where the business did not provide service.

Manufacturer resources were not being fully incorporated into the broader growth strategy, while community and digital visibility lacked a coordinated market-development approach.

The opportunity was not simply to increase marketing activity. It was to create greater alignment between geographic coverage, customer acquisition, service capacity, and the resources already available to the business.

​

The Strategy

​

A market-by-market growth strategy was developed to align sales coverage, digital marketing, community visibility, and manufacturer resources around specific geographic territories.

​

Restructuring Geographic Market Coverage

​

Rather than spreading activity evenly across the region, a structured geographic model concentrated attention on individual markets throughout the week.

Sales attention and service activity were allocated by territory, creating a more deliberate connection between geographic coverage and the use of time and resources.

The shift created a clearer operating structure for a widely dispersed market while preserving the ability to serve multiple communities.

​

Aligning Digital Acquisition With the Service Territory

​

Paid search and display advertising had been reaching consumers outside the business’s practical service area, creating the potential for marketing dollars to be spent generating demand the company could not efficiently serve.

Geographic targeting was tightened around the communities the business actually serviced, concentrating advertising investment within the established service territory.

This created stronger alignment between customer acquisition and operational capacity, ensuring that marketing activity supported areas where the business could realistically provide consultations, measurements, installations, and repairs.

​

Integrating Manufacturer Resources Into the Growth Strategy

​

Hunter Douglas promotional resources were incorporated into the broader customer-acquisition strategy rather than functioning as standalone marketing materials.

This allowed the business to benefit more fully from the strength, credibility, and visual quality of the national brand while adapting those resources to the needs of individual local markets.

Existing assets became part of a coordinated market strategy rather than an underutilized resource.

​

Expanding Digital and Community Visibility

​

Community engagement and social channels were incorporated as supporting components of the broader market-development strategy.

Rather than treating social media or community participation as separate promotional activities, both were used to strengthen visibility within the same geographic markets receiving concentrated sales and marketing attention.

This created greater continuity between paid acquisition, local awareness, community presence, and the markets the business was actively serving.

​

Creating Cross-Functional Market Alignment

​

The broader strategy connected previously separate activities around a common market structure: where the business should concentrate attention, where marketing investment should be deployed, how service coverage should be organized, and how existing resources could work together more effectively.

The result was a more coordinated approach to growth in which sales coverage, customer acquisition, community visibility, and manufacturer resources supported the same geographic priorities.

​

The Results

​

Within approximately three months, the business reported a 14% increase in profit following the shift to a more coordinated market strategy.

The new approach also established:

• A deliberate geographic market-coverage model

• Concentrated sales attention and marketing resources by territory

• Paid advertising focused within the actual service area

• Stronger alignment between customer acquisition and operational capacity

• Greater market visibility through community-based initiatives

• More strategic use of manufacturer resources

• A more coordinated approach to customer acquisition across channels

The improvement was achieved during a period of significant pandemic-related market disruption.

​

Why It Worked

​

The strategy addressed the business as an interconnected system rather than treating scheduling, advertising, visibility, and manufacturer support as separate issues.

Each element was organized around the same geographic market structure.

Sales attention was concentrated within defined territories. Digital acquisition was limited to the communities the business actually serviced. Community visibility supported those same markets. Manufacturer resources strengthened the broader acquisition strategy rather than operating as standalone promotional assets.

This created greater alignment between geographic coverage, resource allocation, customer acquisition, and service capacity.

Instead of simply increasing activity, the strategy made the business’s existing activity more coordinated, more deliberate, and more responsive to the realities of a widely dispersed market—contributing to a reported 14% profit increase within approximately three months.